When the House Burns: Giorgio Agamben on the Coronavirus Crisis

Source: https://architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2020/10/15/when-the-house-burns-giorgio-agamben-on-the-coronavirus-crisis/

While once, everything #Agamben published — even his first commentaries on the #coronavirus — was immediately translated into #English and read around the world, the enemies of reason have done their job, and Agamben, at least in the English-speaking world, has been consigned to the multilingual.

Here is a small excerpt, please take the time to read the whole text. It is beautifully written.

It may be that life disappears from the earth, that no memory remains of what has been done, for better or for worse. But you continue as before, it is too late to change, there is no more time.

That #philosophy and #poetry speak in a language that is less than the language, this is the measure of their rank, of their special vitality. Weighing, judging the world by the measure of a dialect, of a dead language and, however it arose, where there is not even a comma to alter. Keep speaking this dialect, now that the house is burning.

We live in houses, in cities, burning from bottom to top, as if they were still standing; people pretend to #live there and go out into the street, masked among the ruins, as if they were still the familiar neighbourhoods of the past.

And now the flame has changed its shape and nature, having become #digital, invisible and cold; but precisely for this reason it is even closer, it is upon us and surrounds us at every moment.

But how can we testify to a world that is going to ruin with eyes blindfolded and face covered, to a republic that collapses without its sanity or pride, in abjection and #fear? The blindness is all the more desperate because the castaways pretend they govern their own shipwreck, and swear that everything can be controlled technically, that there is no need for a new god or a new sky — only #regulations, experts and doctors. #Panic and #deceit.

A #culture that in the end feels #lifeless tries to govern its ruin as best it can through a state of permanent exception.

Men must be mobilised — must feel in a state of #emergency at every moment, regulated in detail by those who have the power to declare it. But while mobilisation was in the past meant to bring men closer, now it aims to isolate and #distance them from each other.

And now, when there are no more flames, but only numbers, figures and lies, we are certainly weaker and more alone, but without possible compromises, sane as never before.

Men reduced to their pure #biological existence, when the government of men and the government of things merge, are no longer human.

If we remember our #language, if we do not forget that we can speak, then we are freer, we are not forced into things and rules. Language is not a tool: it is our face, the openness in which we are.

The #face is the most human of things. Man has a face and not simply a muzzle or a front, because he dwells in the open, because in his face he is exposed and communicates. This is why the face is the place of #politics. Our unpolitical time does not want to see its own face, it keeps it at a distance, masks and covers it. There must be no more faces, but only numbers and figures. The #tyrant, too, is #faceless.

Feeling myself alive makes life possible for me, even if I were locked in a cage. And nothing is as real as this possibility.

Biological life is an abstraction, and it is this abstraction that it claims to govern and cure.

The #church was actually in solidarity not with salvation but with the history of #salvation, and since it sought salvation through history it could only end in #medicine. And when the time came, the Church did not hesitate to sacrifice salvation to medicine.

Separating us from our #past is the first resource of #power.

We will have to learn again from the beginning how to judge, but with a #judgment that neither punishes nor rewards, neither absolves nor condemns.

Feeling and to feel, sensation and self-affection, are contemporaries. In every sensation there is a feeling of feeling, in every sensation of oneself a feeling of otherness, a friendship and a face.

The tongue remains in the burning house. Not language, but the immemorial, prehistoric, weak forces that guard and remember it: #philosophy and #poetry.

Poetry: the word is the only thing we have left from when we still didn’t know how to speak, an obscure song within the language, a dialect or an idiom which we cannot fully understand, but to which we cannot help but listen — even if the house burns, even if in their burning language men continue to talk nonsense.

Like poetry, #philosophy dwells in language as a part of it, and only the manner of this dwelling distinguishes it from poetry

Realising that the house is on fire does not raise you above the others; on the contrary, it is with them that you will have to exchange a last look as the flames get closer. What can you say to justify your claim to conscience to these men who are so unaware that they seem almost innocent?

A #poem written in the burning house is more just and true, because no one will be able to listen to it, because nothing guarantees that it will escape the flames. But if, by chance, it finds a reader, then he will in no way escape the address that calls him from that helpless, inexplicable, subdued shouting.

Only those who have no chance of being heard can tell the truth, only those who speak from a house which the flames surrounding them are relentlessly consuming.

Man disappears today, like a face in the sand erased on the shore. But what takes its place no longer has a world, only a naked life, silent and without history, at the mercy of the calculations of power and #science.

by Giorgio Agamben (5 October, 2020) : https://www.quodlibet.it/giorgio-agamben-quando-la-casa-brucia

--
#pandemic #covid19 #corona #virus

Klaus #Schwab and his great fascist reset

Call it Since Fiction, call it dystopia, conspiracy theorie or just am exelent #research.
Here I bring together some statements from a longer text, which provides an interesting perspective on the great changes in the world.



Source: https://winteroak.org.uk/2020/10/05/klaus-schwab-and-his-great-fascist-reset/

And, as we will see, he and his accomplices are using the #Covid-19 crisis to bypass democratic accountability, to override opposition, to accelerate their #agenda and to impose it on the rest of humankind against our will in what he terms a “Great Reset“

This new #fascism is today being advanced in the guise of global governance, biosecurity, the “New Normal”, the “New Deal for Nature” and the “Fourth Industrial Revolution”.

Society is no longer regarded as a living community but as a business, whose profitability is the sole valid aim of human activity.

The aim of each and every person’s life was “to achieve long-term growth and prosperity” for this enterprise – in other words, to protect and increase the wealth of the capitalist elite.

Everything in this world is reduced to economic challenges, economic imperatives and economic benefits for the ruling capitalist class.

But he is well aware that #technology is not ideologically neutral, as some like to claim. Technologies and societies shape each other, he says. “After all, technologies are tied up in how we know things, how we make decisions, and how we think about ourselves and each other. They are connected to our identities, worldviews and potential futures. From nuclear technologies to the space race, smartphones, social media, cars, medicine and infrastructure—the meaning of technologies makes them political.

It is this economic imperative that informs Schwab’s enthusiasm for “a #revolution that is fundamentally changing the way we live, work, and relate to one another”. (11)

In general, the interest of the #4IR for the ruling business elite is that it will “create entirely new sources of value” (24) and “give rise to ecosystems of value creation that are impossible to imagine with a mindset stuck in the third Industrial Revolution”. (25)

The #future will challenge our understanding of what it means to be human, from both a biological and a social standpoint”. (35)

“Already, advances in neurotechnologies and biotechnologies are forcing us to question what it means to be human”. (36)

Exoskeletons and prosthetics will increase our physical power, while advances in neurotechnology enhance our cognitive abilities. We will become better able to manipulate our own genes, and those of our children.

“Synthetic #biology” is on the horizon in Schwab’s #4IR world, giving the technocratic capitalist rulers of the world “the ability to customize organisms by writing DNA”. (43)

It is of little comfort to learn that this is all – of course! – in the greater interests of capitalist profiteering since it “heralds new industries and systems for value creation” and “represents an opportunity to create entire new systems of value in the Fourth Industrial Revolution”. (45)

And what about “the bioprinting of organic tissues” (46) or the suggestion that “animals could potentially be engineered to produce pharmaceuticals and other forms of treatment”? (47)

Ethical objections, anyone?

It’s all evidently good for Schwab, who is happy to announce: “The day when cows are engineered to produce in its [sic]milk a blood-clotting element, which hemophiliacs lack, is not far off. Researchers have already started to engineer the genomes of pigs with the goal of growing organs suitable for human transplantation”. (48)

But now, however, he evidently feels eugenics is due a revival, announcing with regard to #genetic editing: “That it is now far easier to manipulate with precision the human genome within viable embryos means that we are likely to see the advent of designer babies in the future who possess particular traits or who are resistant to a specific disease”. (49)

As a result, we may witness an increasing degree of polarization in the world, marked by those who embrace change versus those who resist it.

“This gives rise to an inequality that goes beyond the societal one described earlier. This ontological inequality will separate those who adapt from those who resist—the material winners and losers in all senses of the words. The winners may even benefit from some form of radical human improvement generated by certain segments of the fourth industrial revolution (such as genetic engineering) from which the losers will be deprived. This risks creating class conflicts and other clashes unlike anything we have seen before”. (51)

He adds: “It is, therefore, critical that we invest attention and energy in multistakeholder cooperation across academic, social, political, national and industry boundaries. These interactions and collaborations are needed to create positive, common and hope-filled narratives, enabling individuals and groups from all parts of the world to participate in, and benefit from, the ongoing transformations”. (60)

The same technique, of a fake “narrative” designed to fool good-thinking citizens into supporting an imperialist capitalist scheme, has been used extensively with regard to climate change.

In his 2020 book, Schwab actually lays out the way that fake “#youth #activism” is being used to advance his capitalist aims.

He writes, in a remarkably frank passage: “Youth activism is increasing worldwide, being revolutionized by #social #media that increases mobilization to an extent that would have been impossible before. It takes many different forms, ranging from non-institutionalized political participation to demonstrations and protests, and addresses issues as diverse as #climate #change, economic reforms, gender equality and LGBTQ rights. The young generation is firmly at the vanguard of social change. There is little doubt that it will be the catalyst for change and a source of critical momentum for the Great Reset”. (64)

Schwab uses the term “systems leadership” to describe the profoundly anti-democratic way in which the 1% imposes its agenda on us all, without giving us the chance to say ‘no’.

Systems leadership requires action from all stakeholders, including individuals, business executives, social #influencers and policy-makers”. (83)

.As under #fascism, social structures must be reinvented so as to accommodate the requirements of #capitalism and its profit-increasing #technologies.

He comes up with the suggestion of “public-private data-sharing agreements that ‘break glass in case of emergency’. These come into play only under pre-agreed emergency circumstances (such as a #pandemic) and can help reduce delays and improve the coordination of first responders, temporarily allowing data sharing that would be illegal under normal circumstances”. (89)

Schwab and Malleret place #Covid-19 in a long tradition of events which have facilitated sudden and significant changes to our #societies.

"Some leaders and decision-makers who were already at the forefront of the fight against climate change may want to take advantage of the shock inflicted by the pandemic to implement long-lasting and wider environmental changes. They will, in effect, make ‘good use’ of the pandemic by not letting the crisis go to waste”. (96)

The global capitalist ruling elite have certainly been doing their best to “take advantage of the shock inflicted by the #panic”, assuring us all since the very earliest days of the outbreak that, for some unfathomable reason, nothing in our lives could ever be the same again.

"Many of us are pondering when things will return to normal. The short response is: never”. (97)

Another link is the way that the “the post-pandemic economy” and “the green economy” (104) involve massive profits for largely the same sectors of big business.

Covid-19 has evidently been great news for those capitalists hoping to cash in on environmental destruction, with Schwab and Malleret reporting: “The conviction that ESG strategies benefited from the pandemic and are most likely to benefit further is corroborated by various surveys and reports. Early data shows that the sustainability sector outperformed conventional funds during the first quarter of 2020”. (105)

A #policy paper prepared by Systemiq in collaboration with the #World #Economic #Forum estimates that building the nature-positive economy could represent more than $10 trillion per year by 2030… Resetting the environment should not be seen as a cost, but rather as an investment that will generate economic activity and employment opportunities”. (107)

Given the intertwining of climate and #Covid crises set out by Schwab, we might speculate that the original plan was to push through the New Normal reset on the back of the climate crisis.

But evidently, all that publicity for Greta Thunberg and big business-backed Extinction Rebellion did not whip up enough public panic to justify such measures.

Covid-19 serves Schwab’s purposes perfectly, as the immediate urgency it presents allows the whole process to be speeded up and rushed through without due scrutiny.

For Schwab and his friends, Covid-19 is the great accelerator of everything they have been wanting to foist upon us for years.

“With the pandemic, the ‘digital #transformation’ that so many analysts have been referring to for years, without being exactly sure what it meant, has found its #catalyst. One major effect of confinement will be the expansion and progression of the digital world in a decisive and often permanent manner.

Thus he and #Malleret report with satisfaction that “the pandemic will fast-forward the adoption of #automation in the workplace and the introduction of more robots in our personal and professional lives”. (113)

But it is also good news for all the businesses involved, who no longer have to pay human beings to work for them. #Automation is, and has always been, about saving costs and thus boosting profits for the capitalist elite

They write: “In one form or another, social- and physical-distancing measures are likely to persist after the pandemic itself subsides, justifying the decision in many companies from different industries to accelerate automation.

Our lingering and possibly lasting fear of being infected with a #virus (COVID-19 or another) will thus speed the relentless march of automation, particularly in the fields most susceptible to automation”. (121)

The word “force” is deployed time and time again in the context of Covid-19. Sometimes this is in a business context, as with the statements that “COVID-19 has forced all the banks to accelerate a digital transformation that is now here to stay” COVD or that “the micro reset will force every company in every industry to experiment new ways of doing business, working and operating”. (131)

“During the #lockdowns, many consumers previously reluctant to rely too heavily on digital applications and services were forced to change their habits almost overnight: watching movies online instead of going to the cinema, having meals delivered instead of going out to restaurants, talking to friends remotely instead of meeting them in the flesh, talking to colleagues on a screen instead of chit-chatting at the coffee machine, exercising online instead of going to the gym, and so on…

“Many of the tech #behaviours that we were forced to adopt during confinement will through familiarity become more natural. As social and physical distancing persist, relying more on digital platforms to communicate, or work, or seek advice, or order something will, little by little, gain ground on formerly ingrained habits”. (132)

“While for a pandemic, a majority of citizens will tend to agree with the necessity to impose coercive #measures, they will resist constraining policies in the case of environmental risks where the evidence can be disputed”. (134)

We can denounce their lies! Expose their agenda! Refuse their narrative! Reject their toxic ideology! Resist their fascism

We are the people, we are the 99%, and together we can grab back our freedom from the deadly jaws of the fascist machine!

---

#orgrad

The Smoking Gun: Where is the #coronavirus? The CDC says it isn’t available.

by #JonRappoport
October 8, 2020

The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It is dated July 13, 2020.

Buried deep in the document, on page 39, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified #virus #isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length #RNA…”

The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”

Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.
A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.
Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.
THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.

As if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn’t been proved to exist.

And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world are counting COVID cases and deaths…and governments have instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.

If people believe “you have the virus but it is not available,” and you have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn’t been extracted and purified and isolated, these people believe the moon is made of green cheese.

This is like saying. “We have the 20 trillion dollars, they are contained somewhere in our myriad accounts, we just don’t know where.” If you don’t know where, you don’t know you have the money.

“The car keys are somewhere in the house. We just don’t where.” Really? If you don’t know where, you don’t know the keys are in the house.

“The missing cruise missile is somewhere in the arsenal, we just don’t where.” No. If you don’t know where, you don’t know the missile is in the arsenal.
“The COVID-19 virus is somewhere in the material we have—we just haven’t removed it from that material. But we know what it is and we’ve identified it and we know its structure.” NO YOU DON’T. YOU ASSUME THAT.
Science is not assumptions.

“But…but…there is a study which says a few researchers in a lab isolated the virus…”

They say they did. But in July, the CDC is saying no virus is available. I guess that means trucks were not available to bring the virus from that lab to the CDC. The trucks were out of gas. It was raining. The bridge was washed out. The trucks were in the shop. Joe, the driver, couldn’t find his mask, and he didn’t want to leave home without it…
Science is not assumptions.

The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree.

Dave

13 hours ago
To all Members of the UK Government IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST

We have serious concerns that the elected government is not acting for the people. As an MP it is your duty to serve the public and protect their interests and the UK. It is clear that this has not been happening since the passing of the #Coronavirus Act in March 2020 and we need your help.

We DO NOT consent to the renewal of the Coronavirus Act at its 6 month review in September because that would clearly not be in the public interest. It is not needed, as there is now a mass of information proving that this virus is in no way as severe as the government is making it out to be.

QUESTIONS:

• Why did the UK government itself state on the 19th of March, that the Covid19 virus was #NOT a "High consequence Infectious Disease", then, on the very same day start the process of the Coronavirus Act 2020 with all its draconian rules and regulations, and going against all medical advice?
• Why was this not called the #Covid19 Act? as that was the name of the #virus which we were supposed to be fighting. Instead, it was named after a group of viruses which include the common cold and Influenza, as well as other viruses for which we have not taken such draconian actions for, or destroyed our economy for?
• The Covid19 virus has never been isolated and proven to exist! So why therefore, did the government use the words Covid19 to strike fear into the nation and bringing it to a standstill.
• Why did the government give instruction to hospital medical doctors to place Covid19 on death certificates as the cause of death? Even when tests had not been carried out to confirm the actual cause of death? Instead, they advised doctors to include "Died with" and "suspected of having" as actual deaths from Covid19 (a virus that has never even been proven to exist).
• Why did the government give instructions to medical staff in hospitals and care homes, to apply "Do Not Resuscitate" (DNR)notices on patients over 45, who were suspected of having Covid19? Also it issued the same instructions on disabled people suspected of having the disease, regardless of age? And why did the government give advice for elderly people in care homes with the disease, not to be admitted to hospitals? THIS IS TANTAMOUNT TO MANSLAUGHTER!
• Why is the government using a testing method that cannot detect Covid19 and secondly, was never designed to carry out this function, as stated by its designer and originator? These tests are at best 50% accurate and repeatedly give "false positives".

You are actually not testing for covid19, but testing for Coronavirus which could show positive even when a person has had a common cold or influenza. So why is the Government using this method to perpetuate the fear mongering statistics, and spending billions on future similar testing, wasting tax payer's money just to support its argument. (As stated in Sunday express 06/09/2020)

• Why did the government place a gagging order on hospital staff, instructing them not to communicate with the media, under penalty of disciplinary action?
• Why has the Government instructed hospitals not to carry out treatments in hospitals during this period, causing the deaths of people with ongoing serious conditions, and causing around an estimated 20,000 avoidable deaths? In addition, the lack of diagnostic tests being carried out by hospitals during the last 6 months is estimated to result in future premature deaths of up to 30,000 people. Together these amount to more deaths than caused by the virus.
• Why has the government rolled out laws around the wearing of masks in enclosed spaces, when it has never carried out any risk assessments around the dangers of wearing masks. Evidence around the wearing of masks is scientifically divided, with many saying it can actually be dangerous and cause additional diseases.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS.

Prof Neil Ferguson has been involved with generating projected figures of COVID19 infection and mortality. Ferguson is on the management team of the "Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium". This group is overseen and funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

In the normal course of things, where experts are advising government on matters, conflicts of interest are meant to be disclosed. Bill Gates (who has no medical qualifications or training) implied in a BBC interview that he treats mass vaccination, and possibly tracking to whom these vaccinations have been administered, as a “business interest.” It appears Professor Ferguson is also involved in this “interest.” and therefore should have never been an advisor to the government.

Prof. Chris Whittey is the UK's Chief medical officer, and involved also in advising the government with regards to the Corona virus. In 2008 he was awarded £38 million by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation for Malaria research in Africa. A year later he was appointed Chief Scientific advisor to the Department for International Development.

Prof. Whitty was also part of the government's SAGE committee, which has made recommendations about the duration of the UK's Covid19 lockdown. Concerns are being raised about the intention to keep some of the SAGE activities secret, and the connections and conflict of interest of Prof. Whitty to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

There are also concerns about Mr Hancock having ties to a company called "Babylon healthcare services which promotes an App called "GP at Hand". It has not escaped peoples attention that as part of Covid measures that GP's have vastly increased their use of telephones or remote appointments.

#PSYCHOLOGICAL #WARFARE AGAINST THE #PEOPLE.

In a government document entitled "Options for increasing adherence to social distancing measures" (22nd March 2020) we come across the following:

a) Perceived threat. "A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened." Action to be taken, "The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased amongst those who are complacent, using hard hitting emotional messaging."

b) Also stated in this document it says "Use media to increase sense of personal threat", "Consider enacting legislation to compel required behaviours" Consider use of social disapproval for failure to comply."

This document strongly suggests that Government ministers, and/or their advisors, have committed an offense under the UK Terrorism Act .

There are many other instances of inappropriate behaviour and law breaking by this Government which we hold in reserve.

WE PLACE THIS GOVERNMENT ON NOTICE.

That "WE the PEOPLE of the UNITED KINGDOM, disagree and disapprove, of all the actions taken by the Government with regards to the alleged Covid19 Pandemic.

We request that ALL CURRENT LEGISLATION surrounding the Covid19 pandemic be removed, and life in the UK be returned to normal.

Also, that a full and detailed Public Enquiry be held as soon as possible.

We hold this Government in its entirety, responsible for all avoidable deaths caused by their draconian measures including suicides, for their lies and deceit to the people of this country, and will seek retribution in the courts for their actions.

Signed on behalf of the People of the United Kingdom.

"Covid-19 : évitez les rassemblements privés" : l'appel de six médecins

https://www.lejdd.fr/Societe/covid-19-evitez-les-rassemblement-prives-lappel-de-six-medecins-3991391

#CoronavirusFrance #Covid19Fr #tribune

—

"Le #virus 🦠 #circule de plus en plus vite. Enfin, c'est nous qui le faisons circuler car il n'a pas le pouvoir de se déplacer seul. Nous sommes à une nouvelle étape de l'#épidémie : celle de sa diffusion. Nous perdons petit à petit la trace des nouvelles #contaminations . Il reste probablement peu de temps pour agir collectivement. Nous avons beaucoup demandé aux Français, avec des mesures parfois difficiles à comprendre, en particulier à un moment où le virus semblait à son plus faible. Malgré cela, les #indicateurs se dégradent et nous ne savons pas jusqu'où cela ira. L'indispensable #masque est désormais obligatoire presque partout, et pourtant les contaminations progressent.

Aussi, après la joie des retrouvailles de l'été, il est temps de faire attention dans le milieu privé. Des #contaminations ont lieu lors de réunions de famille ou d'amis. Nous comprenons qu'après une semaine difficile, vous ayez envie de profiter de vos proches le week-end. C'est malheureusement dans ces situations que vous risquez soit de contracter le virus, soit de le diffuser, car une des caractéristiques déroutantes du Sars-CoV-2 est la part importante des personnes #asymptomatiques et #contagieuses . À mesure que l'épidémie progresse, la #probabilité d'être contaminé dans ces #lieux #clos augmente.

Vendredi, en Grande-Bretagne, la ville de Birmingham a interdit les rencontres entre amis et en famille. Nous, médecins, ne sommes pas dans l'injonction. Mais il faut prendre soin les uns des autres et peut-être siffler la fin de la récréation. Évitez, autant que possible, les rassemblements privés. Plus une #pièce est petite, plus elle contient de monde, moins elle est #aérée , et plus vous augmentez les risques. Réduisez le nombre de personnes présentes dans le cadre privé. Si possible, #reportez toute réunion. Sinon, portez un masque, comme au travail. Sans oublier la #distanciation . Ces situations simples de la #VieQuotidienne sont à #risque . Il est encore temps d'agir, tous #ensemble ."

18h30 , le 12 septembre 2020.

#LeJDD #LagardèreMédiaNews

It is important to note that Manhattan has the highest population density with the lowest incidence of the so-called phantom COVID-19 viral infections. The Bronx has half the population density of Manhattan with nearly twice the incidences.

It is also very important to point out that Manhattan has more people located on higher floors, away from earth pollution poisoning and earth plumes whereas the Bronx has more people located on lower floors near earth plume pollution. Finally, the Bronx is nearer to the newly installed upwind electric power plants which emits excessive amounts of air and electromagnetic pollution.

New York City - A City of Toxic Air Pollution and Earth Plumes

Metaphorically speaking, New York City is a petri dish of people who are vulnerable for being poisoned to death by the application of a dye of toxic fracked-fuel exhaust and NOT some invisible phantom. This is revealed in terms of their morbidity and mortality when looking at incidences and not cases determined by inconclusive and vague antibody or RTPCR testing.. "

A recent Harvard study finds that those vulnerable to the symptoms of the so-called "virus" are generated by long-term chemical poisoning from air pollution. A small increase in long-term exposure to PM2.5 leads to a large increase in the symptoms and death rate claimed to be caused by the #phantom #virus, #COVID-19 … 1 μg/m3 in PM2.5 of #hydrogencyanide #air #pollution #poisoning is associated with an 8% increase in the COVID-19 death rate. Once again, the increase in the COVID-19 death rate is due to chemical poisoning from air pollution and NOT from an invisible phantom virus. As you can see in the chart below hydrogen cyanide poisoning and its symptoms are identical to those claimed as an infectious virus now known as COVID-19 which has never been scientifically identified, isolated and cultured under Koch's postulates, validating its existence of so-called virus.

[14]#Hydrogen #Cyanide Poisoning Symptoms From #Fracking are #Identical to the So-Called #COVID - 19 Virus [82-91]
A study from #TelAviv University, describes the long-term #NO2 or nitrogen dioxide air pollution poisoning component as a "most important contributor" to the COVID-19 pandemic. Once again, showing that the invisible phantom virus is NOT the cause of the symptoms listed above but are the result of acidic air pollution and earth plumes.

[NO2 (Nitrogen dioxide)] is one of the most obvious contributors to fatality caused by the COVID-19 virus in these regions and maybe across the whole world.

[15]

Are Large Populations a Contributing Factor or Risk for Viral Infection

Air pollution has already been acknowledged by many researchers as a major cofactor for COVID-19 dis-ease. It has been suggested by some scientists that incidences are high in NYC because of the higher population density, and thus, social distancing of six feet, when not maintained will lead to more cases of COVID-19 infections..

A comparison of the five NYC boroughs refutes this theory of population density and therefore social distancing is NOT a common denominator in the increased infections. The boroughs listed below are all within a small geographical area, sharing a common environment in terms of above-ground and therefore subjected to acidic air pollution and earth plume poisoning.

It is important to note that Manhattan has the highest population density with the lowest incidence of the so-called phantom COVID-19 viral infections. The Bronx has half the population density of Manhattan with nearly twice the incidences.

It is also very important to point out that Manhattan has more people located on higher floors, away from earth pollution poisoning and earth plumes whereas the Bronx has more people located on lower floors near earth plume pollution. Finally, the Bronx is nearer to the newly installed upwind electric power plants which emits excessive amounts of air and electromagnetic pollution.

New York City - A City of Toxic Air Pollution and Earth Plumes

Metaphorically speaking, New York City is a petri dish of people who are vulnerable for being poisoned to death by the application of a dye of toxic fracked-fuel exhaust and NOT some invisible phantom. This is revealed in terms of their morbidity and mortality when looking at incidences and not cases determined by inconclusive and vague antibody or RTPCR testing.. "

(Then a very long list of References which in itself contains a huge amount of information including images and videos, and then links to more articles, such as: https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/s...rkably-low-why
and
https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/t...e-viral-theory

Gratitude to Dr. Young! )